Hey there, football fans! If you’re anything like me, there’s nothing quite like the electric buzz of an NFL matchup between the Chicago Bears vs Green Bay Packers Match Player Stats. This isn’t just any game—it’s the game in the NFC North, a rivalry that’s been heating up since 1921. With over 210 clashes under their belts, these two teams have given us more drama, heartbreak, and sheer excitement than most Hollywood blockbusters. And on January 5, 2025, at the frozen tundra of Lambeau Field, the Bears pulled off a stunning 24-22 upset victory over the Packers—their first win in the series since 2018 and snapping an 11-game losing streak in the rivalry.
Whether you’re a die-hard Bears fan celebrating that long-awaited redemption or a Packers supporter scratching your head over how it slipped away, diving into the player stats from this game is like reliving every heart-pounding moment. In this article, we’ll break it all down in a way that’s easy to follow—no jargon overload, just straightforward insights. We’ll look at the stars who shone brightest, the key plays that turned the tide, and even some historical context to put these numbers in perspective. Grab your lucky jersey, and let’s get into the nitty-gritty of the Chicago Bears vs Green Bay Packers match player stats.
The Historic Rivalry: Why This Game Always Feels Bigger Than Football
Before we crunch the numbers, a quick backstory for the newcomers (or anyone who needs a refresher). The Bears-Packers feud is the oldest and most played in NFL history. Green Bay holds a slight edge overall, with 108 wins to Chicago’s 96 and six ties. But don’t let that fool you—the Bears have had their glory days, like the infamous 61-7 blowout in 1980 or the shutout masterpiece in 2006 that left Brett Favre stunned.
Fast-forward to 2025, and the stakes were sky-high. The Packers, at 10-6, were fighting for playoff seeding. The Bears, limping in at 4-12, were playing spoiler after firing head coach Matt Eberflus mid-season. Rookie sensation Caleb Williams was looking to build confidence, while Jordan Love aimed to solidify his status as Green Bay’s franchise guy. The game had it all: trick plays, last-minute heroics, and injuries that added extra chaos. The final score? Bears 24, Packers 22. It was a nail-biter that ended with Chicago’s defense stuffing a late Packers drive, sealing the win and sending Green Bay into the playoffs as the No. 7 seed.
What made this game special wasn’t just the outcome—it was the individual performances that lit up the stat sheet. Let’s start with the team totals to set the stage, then zoom in on the players who made it happen.
Game Overview: Team Stats That Tell the Story
At a glance, this was a balanced battle. Both teams moved the ball well but struggled in the red zone, leading to a field-goal fest early on. The Bears edged it out thanks to explosive special teams and clutch throws from Williams. Here’s a simple table breaking down the key team stats—think of it as the scoreboard’s big picture.
| Category | Chicago Bears | Green Bay Packers |
|---|---|---|
| Total Yards | 312 | 345 |
| Passing Yards | 198 | 212 |
| Rushing Yards | 114 | 133 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 2 |
| Third-Down Conversions | 6/14 (43%) | 5/13 (38%) |
| Time of Possession | 29:45 | 30:15 |
| Penalties | 8/65 yards | 6/45 yards |
The Packers controlled the ball slightly longer and racked up more yards, but Chicago’s efficiency on third downs and fewer mistakes proved decisive. Their defense forced two turnovers, including a fumble that led to points. On offense, the Bears leaned on a gritty ground game, while Green Bay’s pass-heavy attack fizzled in crunch time. Now, let’s meet the heroes (and a few goats) behind these numbers.
Bears’ Standout Stars: Player Stats from the Winning Side
For Chicago, this win felt like a breath of fresh air in a brutal season. Rookie QB Caleb Williams showed why he’s the No. 1 pick from 2024—poise under pressure and big throws when it mattered. He finished 22-of-35 for 198 yards, two touchdowns, and that one costly interception, but his 85.4 passer rating doesn’t tell the full story. Williams spread the ball around, hitting eight different receivers, and added 22 rushing yards on scrambles that kept drives alive.
Wide receiver DJ Moore was Williams’ go-to guy, hauling in 7 catches for 102 yards and a crucial 32-yard touchdown in the fourth quarter that gave the Bears their first lead since the opening quarter. That score? A perfectly placed deep ball over the top—pure magic. Moore also bounced back from an earlier fumble, proving his clutch gene.
On the ground, D’Andre Swift was a workhorse, churning out 14 carries for 71 yards, including a 39-yard burst that set up a field goal. Roschon Johnson chipped in with a 1-yard touchdown plunge right before halftime, his second score of the season and a momentum-shifter that had Bears fans roaring.
But the real game-changer? Special teams. Punter/returner Josh Blackwell’s 94-yard punt return touchdown in the first quarter was a thing of beauty—a fake-out where he grabbed the ball while the coverage chased a decoy DJ Moore. That 7-0 lead set the tone, and Blackwell’s speed (clocked at 4.3 seconds over 40 yards) turned a routine play into highlight-reel gold. Kicker Cairo Santos was flawless, nailing 3-of-3 field goals, including a 37-yarder late to ice it.
Defensively, the Bears’ front seven harassed Love all day. Montez Sweat led with 2 sacks and 8 tackles, while T.J. Edwards snagged an interception off a tipped pass. Their 4 total sacks limited Green Bay to just 4.2 yards per carry. Here’s a quick table of the Bears’ top performers:
| Player | Position | Key Stats | Impact Highlight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caleb Williams | QB | 22/35, 198 yds, 2 TD, 1 INT | 32-yd TD pass to Moore |
| DJ Moore | WR | 7 rec, 102 yds, 1 TD | Game-tying score in Q4 |
| D’Andre Swift | RB | 14 att, 71 yds | 39-yd run sparking comeback |
| Josh Blackwell | KR/PR | 1 punt ret TD (94 yds) | Trick-play TD flipped momentum |
| Cairo Santos | K | 3/3 FG (37, 28, 45 yds) | Game-winning kick |
| Montez Sweat | DE | 2 sacks, 8 tackles | Pressure forcing Love’s INT |
These guys didn’t just fill the stat sheet—they embodied the “Monsters of the Midway” spirit, turning a potential blowout loss into a rivalry-defining W.
Packers’ Key Contributors: Close, But Not Close Enough
Over in green and gold, it was a tale of “what ifs.” Jordan Love started hot but cooled off, going 19-of-32 for 212 yards, 1 touchdown, and 2 interceptions (one returned for a pick-six threat). His 78.2 rating was middling, hampered by a gimpy ankle that limited his mobility. Still, Love connected on some dimes, like a 28-yard strike to Romeo Doubs that set up a field goal.
Running back Emanuel Wilson stepped up big in relief of the injured Josh Jacobs, rushing 18 times for 89 yards and a gritty 21-yard touchdown in the fourth that tied it at 17-17. Wilson averaged 4.9 yards per carry, breaking tackles left and right—his vision on that go-ahead score was vintage Packers power running.
Christian Watson was Love’s deep threat, exploding for 4 catches on 150 yards, including a jaw-dropping 60-yard bomb that led to Love’s scrambling touchdown run. Watson’s speed (sub-4.4 40-yard dash) stretched the field, forcing the Bears’ secondary to play honest and opening underneath lanes.
Kicker Brandon McManus kept Green Bay in it with 2-of-2 field goals (37 and 42 yards), but a missed extra point after Wilson’s TD loomed large. Defensively, Rashan Gary notched 1.5 sacks and 6 tackles, while Jaire Alexander (before exiting with a knee tweak) blanketed Moore early. Quay Walker led tacklers with 10 stops, but the unit couldn’t stop that punt return disaster or force a game-sealing turnover.
Injuries hurt: Love’s ankle, Jacobs’ absence, and late scratches like Christian Watson’s hamstring pull (wait, no—Watson played through). The Packers’ 133 rushing yards showed balance, but two turnovers (a fumble and Love’s INT) were killers. Check out their top stats in this table:
| Player | Position | Key Stats | Impact Highlight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Love | QB | 19/32, 212 yds, 1 TD, 2 INT | 60-yd pass to Watson |
| Emanuel Wilson | RB | 18 att, 89 yds, 1 TD | 21-yd TD tying game in Q4 |
| Christian Watson | WR | 4 rec, 150 yds | Career-high yards stretching field |
| Brandon McManus | K | 2/2 FG (37, 42 yds) | Kept Packers within striking distance |
| Rashan Gary | DE | 1.5 sacks, 6 tackles | QB pressure on Williams |
| Quay Walker | LB | 10 tackles | Run stops limiting Swift |
Green Bay’s talent was there, but small mistakes—like a debated timeout call by coach Matt LaFleur on fourth-and-4—cost them dearly. Love to Watson was electric, but the Bears’ special teams spark proved the difference.
Turning Points: How Player Stats Shaped the Game’s Drama
Stats are cool, but context makes them epic. Let’s rewind the tape on a few moments where individual brilliance (or blunders) swung the pendulum.
- First Quarter Fireworks: Blackwell’s Punt Return TD (7-0 Bears) With the game scoreless, the Packers punted from their own 20. Enter Josh Blackwell’s trickery—faking out the coverage for a 94-yard house call. That stat line? One play, seven points, and a psychological edge. The Bears’ return game averaged 15.2 yards per return all season; this one was legendary.
- Packers’ Response: McManus FG (7-3) Love marched 50 yards in six plays, capped by Christian Watson’s 22-yard grab. McManus’ 37-yarder from there kept Green Bay close. Love’s completion percentage here? A crisp 75% on those drives.
- Halftime Spark: Johnson’s TD Run (14-3 Bears) Trailing 10-3, Williams hit Cole Kmet for 18 yards to set up Roschon Johnson’s 1-yard plunge. Johnson’s stat? Just 4 carries for 12 yards total, but that score ended a 25-possession touchdown drought for Chicago’s offense.
- Third Quarter Stalemate: Field Goal Exchanges McManus answered with a 42-yarder (14-6), then Santos hit from 28 (17-6). Efficiency ruled—Packers converted 2-of-4 third downs here, Bears 3-of-5. D’Andre Swift’s 39-yard scamper ate clock and yards.
- Fourth Quarter Chaos: Moore’s TD and Wilson’s Reply (17-17 Tie) Williams to Moore for 32 yards—boom, 24-17 Bears lead after Santos’ PAT. Wilson countered with his 21-yard TD run, but the missed extra point left it 24-22. Wilson’s burst? A career-long 21 yards, showcasing his breakaway speed.
- Final Drive Heartbreaker: Packers Stalled Love needed 2 yards on fourth down but opted for a FG debate—timeout, then punt. Sweat’s pressure forced an incompletion. Love’s final drive: 2-of-5, 18 yards. Bears ball, kneel down, win.
These moments highlight how stats intersect with strategy. The Bears’ 114 rushing yards came at pivotal times, while Green Bay’s 212 passing yards were front-loaded.
Historical Echoes: How 2025 Stats Stack Up Against Chicago Bears vs Green Bay Packers Match Player Stats Rivalry Lore
This game’s player performances fit right into Bears-Packers lore. Caleb Williams’ 198 yards echo Rex Grossman’s 2006 shutout game (where Chicago blanked GB 26-0). DJ Moore’s 102 yards? Reminiscent of Harlon Hill’s 1950s dominance against Green Bay. On the flip side, Love’s two INTs hurt like Favre’s occasional meltdowns in the rivalry.
Historically, the Packers own recent edges—26 wins in 29 games before this—but Chicago’s special teams flair harks back to their 1963 sweep (26-7 win). All-time, Bears RBs average 3.8 yards per carry vs. GB; Swift’s 5.1 here was a notch above. Packers WRs? They’ve feasted, with 1,200+ yards in rivalry games last decade—Watson’s 150 was on brand.
Looking ahead, with a December 7, 2025 rematch looming at Soldier Field, these stats set up juicy storylines. Will Williams build on his 2-TD day? Can Love shake the INT bug? The rivalry’s 211th chapter can’t come soon enough.
Wrapping It Up: Stats, Stories, and What’s Next for Chicago Bears vs Green Bay Packers Match Player Stats
Whew, what a ride! The January 5, 2025 Chicago Bears vs Green Bay Packers Match Player Stats delivered player stats that’ll be debated in taverns from Chicago to Milwaukee for years. From Blackwell’s punt-return wizardry to Watson’s deep-threat fireworks, it was a showcase of why we love this sport—unpredictable, passionate, and full of larger-than-life characters.